Ramayana

The opposite is a fact as of the Ramayana and also tenable for that will align with the vedas. Do not even aspire to commit that each one worships the other …never for purans are really stories unless vedas are considered. Shiva never worships Ram. Ram is not even a deity in the vedas how does he becomes such?* (*Both Rama and Krishna could have been herbs treating leprosy) Rama was a saintly king or a Vishnu’ s manifestation. Either way Rams worshipping is found in the stories of the Purans . That is a memory based bluff or deception made by some anti vedic community. In the vedas Ram was just a noble king how might He be God? Definitely not .. N.B., Upanishads as Rama Tapini or Rama Rashya, Mahopanishad..etc are not vedic Upanishads..these are attached to the vedas but not vedas. Yes, His greatness was such that as if He was a God! And we have every reason to pay obeisances to Rama . However not making a Mockery of Shiva, the sublime Brahmn Om. ( Shruti). The purans in the chapter of delivering have only created competitive faiths and divisions. Thus those stories of the Purans are made to appease the ego of a community who failed to conform with the righteous shruties. They had to create a habitat of living in the illusion to respect a deity they would worship. This is the negetive aspect of devotion in steadiness of a deity. Shiva is however the only truth of Sanatana Dharma! ( “Eko hi Rudra”* ….iti shruti) Purans can be contradicted against Vedas. Itihahasas and non-vedas are same too as opposition to the vedas are diversions in sanatan dharma. Mention of Krishna in Chandyoga Upanishad or in Taittariya Aranyaka ( if you may) does not place him as the Supreme God. It is sad that even today we have to believe in those fake literatures. (* we saw “Eko hi Narayana” in Mahopanishad but again this is NOT a Shruti or veda, in fact it eulogies Shiva in disguise!) Attribution: Pictures: copyright ©️ lies with the concerned authority and sources Newphvedans2